Welcome to Guangdong Qinglong Construction Engineering Co., Ltd.!
UHPC & GRC Complex Architecture Manufacturing
A Global Benchmark in Smart Architectural Fabrication
2026-08-26 16:03:22
Click:
The mould is half of any complex-shaped GRC project — by cost, by schedule, and by impact on the final quality. Choose the wrong mould material and the panels fail. Choose the wrong mould ownership strategy and the project leaks margin. This article walks through the mould development process (digital model to mould delivery), the five mould material options, the cost share of moulds in complex-shaped GRC, and the three ownership strategies that protect the buyer's position.
For a complex-shaped GRC project, the mould cost typically represents:
The mould determines the panel geometry, the surface quality, the production cycle time, and the mould life (how many pieces can be made before mould replacement). A wrong mould decision cascades through the entire project.
The architectural model (typically Rhino + Grasshopper) is the master. The deepening designer adds demoulding draft, panel thickness, and mould split lines. The output is the mould fabrication model.
Common failure mode: the architectural model is sent directly to the mould shop without the deepening designer's adjustments. The mould is fabricated to the architectural surface, but it doesn't demould. Result: scrap mould.
Most complex-shaped moulds are fabricated in multiple pieces and assembled before casting. The split lines are placed at:
Common failure mode: split lines placed at random, causing visible seams on the panel surface. Result: rejection by the architect or costly panel-side fairing.
Five mould material options are typical for GRC:
Selection rules of thumb:
Mould fabrication is typically 2–6 weeks depending on material and complexity:
Steel moulds are the longest lead time because of the CNC machining and surface finishing required to achieve the precision benchmark.
Before any production panels are cast, the mould is verified by:
The trial phase typically consumes 5–10 days and 3–5% of the mould cost. Skipping it is one of the most expensive shortcuts in GRC production.
For a typical high-complexity GRC panel at RMB 800/m² factory price:
Mould amortisation is the largest single line for small batches (50–200 pieces). As the batch grows, the share drops — at 1,000 pieces per mould, mould amortisation can fall to 5%–10% of the unit price.
The factory fabricates and owns the mould. The buyer pays a per-piece amortisation in the unit price. The mould stays at the factory for the duration of the project and is the factory's asset at project end.
Pros: low upfront cost for the buyer; factory handles mould maintenance.
Cons: if the buyer wants additional pieces after the project ends (e.g., a phase 2), the factory may have scrapped the mould or may charge a re-mobilisation fee; the per-piece price reflects full mould amortisation regardless of how many pieces the buyer actually orders.
Best for: one-off projects, projects with stable scope, projects where the buyer doesn't anticipate follow-on orders.
The buyer pays for the mould fabrication upfront (or amortised into the first N pieces), and the mould is the buyer's asset. The buyer stores the mould between projects or transfers it to the factory for the next project.
Pros: per-piece price is lower (no mould amortisation after the first N pieces); buyer controls mould fate; mould is available for follow-on projects without re-mobilisation.
Cons: high upfront cost (RMB 50,000–500,000 per mould); buyer is responsible for mould storage and maintenance between projects.
Best for: phased projects, projects with anticipated follow-on orders, design-conscious buyers who want mould control for quality reasons.
The mould is jointly owned for the project duration. After the project, the buyer has first right of refusal to take ownership at a residual value (typically 30%–50% of original mould cost).
Pros: balanced risk; the factory has incentive to maintain the mould during the project (it's partially theirs); the buyer has option for follow-on without full upfront cost.
Cons: more complex contract terms; the residual valuation can be disputed.
Best for: phased projects with uncertain follow-on volume; consortium projects with multiple stakeholders.
Between projects, moulds need:
A well-maintained mould can last 5–10 years across multiple projects. A poorly maintained mould may need refurbishment after 1–2 projects, costing 20%–40% of the original mould cost.
Moulds are 20%–60% of complex-shaped GRC project cost. The development process (digital model → split lines → material selection → fabrication → trial) is 4–10 weeks. Five mould materials (wood, FRP, silicone, steel, aluminium) cover the full range from one-off to high-volume. Three ownership strategies (factory-owned, buyer-owned, shared) align the cost and risk with the project structure. Mould storage and maintenance extend mould life and protect the investment.
Guangdong Qinglong Construction's mould shop handles all five mould materials with CNC machining, trial casting, and mould library services. Visit the official website for sample mould cost models and ownership term sheets.